amount of dispersion will depend on the state of turbulence
turbulence is determined by the atmosphere's stratification /
stability, surface roughness, and wind speed
traditionally transport and dispersion for regulatory purposes,
is modelled using variants of a ``Gaussian Plume Model'' which have
been modified to account for inversions, terrain, etc.
mean concentrations of pollutants downwind of a stack will
closely follow a normal distribution
the Gaussian model equation:
(x, y, z, H) = exp - ×exp - + exp -
(1)
where X is the rate of emission from the source (kg s-1)
,
are the horizontal and vertical standard
deviations of the pollutant distribution in the y and z directions (m)
is the mean horizontal wind speed through the depth of
the plume direction (m s-1)
H is the effective stack height (m)
is the pollutant concentration (kg m-3), and is a
function space, and the nature of turbulence.
if only the ground level concentrations are required, this
equation simplifies somewhat:
(x, y, z, H) = exp - +
(2)
the 's are a measure of the vertical and horizontal
spreading of a plume and thus represent the amount of atmospheric
dispersion which depends on the state of turbulence
they will be a function of x, as well as atmospheric stability
and surface roughness
the trick in much of this kind of dispersion modelling is in
accurate calculation / estimation of the 's
in the absence of accurate turbulence data, it is possible to
crudely categorize the stability of the atmosphere based on routine
atmospheric observations (table 1).
Table 1:
Note: A, extremely unstable; B, moderately unstable; C,
slightly unstable; D, neutral (heavy overcast day or night); E,
slightly stable; F, moderately stable.
Surface
Daytime solar radiation
Nighttime conditions
wind m s-1
Strong
Moderate
Slight
4/8 clouds
3/8 clouds
< 2
A
A-B
B
-
-
2-3
A-B
B
C
E
F
3-4
B
B-C
C
D
E
4-6
C
C-D
D
D
D
> 6
C
D
D
D
D
Briggs (1973) proposed a series of empirical formulae for the
determination of
and
:
Table 2:
Briggs'
,
formulae for elevated
small releases, where
102 < x < 104 m.
Stability
(m)
(m)
Class
Open country conditions
A
0.22x(1 + 0.0001x)- .5
.20x
B
0.16x(1 + 0.0001x)- .5
.12x
C
0.11x(1 + 0.0001x)- .5
.08x(1 + 0.0002x)- .5
D
0.08x(1 + 0.0001x)- .5
.06x(1 + 0.0015x)- .5
E
0.06x(1 + 0.0001x)- .5
.03x(1 + 0.0003x)-1
F
0.04x(1 + 0.0001x)- .5
.016x(1 + 0.0003x)-1
Urban conditions
A-B
0.32x(1 + 0.0004x)- .5
.24x(1 + 0.001x).5
C
0.22x(1 + 0.0004x)- .5
.20x
D
0.16x(1 + 0.0004x)- .5
.14x(1 + .0003x)- .5
E-F
0.11x(1 + 0.0004x)- .5
.08x(1 + .00015x)- .5
[OH Oke 9.8, 9.11]
the above model does not include many very important effects
terrain effects on impingement and steering the plume
vertical variations in stability
horizontal or vertical variations in the wind field
local circulations
modern implementations of the GPM have parameterizations to try
and remedy these shortcomings
other methods of modelling transport and dispersion include:
Puff models - treat emissions as a series of 'puffs' which
are individually transported and dispersed (variant of GPM)
Box models - based upon conservation of pollutant mass within
a volume (often used in chemical transformation models,
e.g. photochemical models)
Gradient transport models - based upon flux/gradient (K)
turbulent transport (GPM is a special case of this in which the
eddy diffussivities are constant)
Trajectory models - move a vertical column at the mean wind
speed with pollutants added at the bottom as they are generated
Mesoscale models / Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Models -
mesoscale atmospheric models produce gridded mean wind fields,
many particles are inserted into the wind field and are
transported by the mean wind and diffused by a random element
representing turbulence